Download it! | Open Player in New Window

Have you ever heard the one about the theatrical trailer that was so detailed that you didn't need to see the movie? Some fans are feeling the same way about Doctor Who leaks and promotional information. But I'm not sure those are "spoilers." Pedantry ho!

Tagged with:

3 Responses to 2MTL 122: A Spoiler-free Discussion of Doctor Who Spoilers

  1. I don't think it's unreasonable for fans to want to go in completely blind. What I DO think unreasonable is the expectation by some fans that the media should coddle them. If you want to avoid spoilers, that's on you, and if you happen to see something you'd rather not see, then tough luck, better luck next time.

    I didn't think the Radio Times cover was that bad, although if I had the power to unsee things I probably would apply it here. Still, the benefit gained by that cover far outweighs the psychological scarring of the fandom. 🙂

    Good episode, Chip.

  2. Darkglasses aka Joel says:

    What exactly is the RadioTimes covers spoiling? The colours are representative of the three major UK political parties in relation to their upcoming election and have no correlation to the episode in question (as far as I am aware). Whether the slight 're-design' is relevant though I'm not sure but I wouldn't consider it a spoiler.

  3. Darkglasses aka Joel says:

    So it's turns out I was wrong… oh well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.